IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Arun Bhansali, CJ. Kshitij Shailendra, J.
State of U.P. and 2 others - Appellant
Versus
Md. Sameer Rao and 3 others - Respondent
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 459 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment challenges the denial of name change application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. right to change name is linked to fundamental rights. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. appellants argue for regulation compliance and restrictions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. supreme court's stance on name change conditions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's jurisdiction and declaration of legal character. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. civil court decree necessary for name change validation. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. endless name change process concerns highlighted. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. distinction between gazette notifications and court decrees. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. gazette publication requires legal backing. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 10. regulations must be followed; reading down is limited. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 11. jurisdiction issues concerning regulation challenges. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 12. petitioner's case lacks merit. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 13. appeal allowed; single judge's order set aside. (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT :
Kshitij Shailendra, J.
1. State of U.P., U.P. Board of High School and Intermediate Education (for short the ‘Board’) and its Regional Secretary are in intra court appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the High Court Rules, 1952 assailing the validity of the judgment and order dated 25.05.2023 whereby the learned Single Judge, while allowing Writ-C No. 3671 of 2022 (Md Sameer Rao Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others), has set aside the order dated 24.12.2020 passed by the Regional Secretary of the Board and has also issued a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents of the writ petition to allow the application of the writ petitioner to change his name from “Shahnawaz” to “Md Sameer Rao” and, accordingly, issue fresh High School and Intermediate Certificates incorporating the said change. Learned Single Judge has also issued various other directions like surrender of public documents of identity like Adhar card, Ration card, Driving Licence, Passport, Voter I.D. card etc to the competent authorities with a direction to them to register the change of name, dispose off or destroy the earlier identity documents as per law and issue fresh documents consistent with his changed name. Learned Single Judge has also issued a direction to the Secretary, Ministry of Home, Government of India and the Chief Secretary, Government of U.P., Lucknow to create appropriate legal and administrative framework to ensure that both Governments work in concert to achieve the end of making identity related identity documents removing anomalies therein.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE
2. Admittedly, the writ petitioner Md Sameer Rao was earlier known as Shahnawaz. He appeared in and cleared the High School and Intermediate Examinations conducted by the Board, respectively in the year 2013 and 2015 by the same name. He had all identity cards issued in his name as Shahnawaz. Copies of Adhar card and PAN card were brought on record of the proceedings. In the year 2020, based upon some newly issued Adhar card and PAN card in the name of Md. Sameer Rao and also a gazette notification published in Gazette of India bearing Gazette No. 39 New Delhi, Saturday, September 26 - October 2, 2020 (Asvina 4, 1942) Part-IV, Page 1091, he approached the Board to incorporate his new name in the High School and Intermediate Certificates and issue new certificates having his name printed as “Md. Sameer Rao”. The said application was rejected by the Regional Secretary of the Board by order dated 24.12.2020 on the ground that as the case fell with the category of “time barred matter” and, as per Regulation 7 of Chapter III of the Regulations framed under U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (for short the Act, 1921), request for change cannot be considered after a period of three years. It is this order which was challenged by the writ petitioner and has been set aside by the learned Single Judge and is impugned in the instant appeal.
3. THE ORDER DATED 24.12.2020 IMPUGNED BEFORE THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE

GIST OF JUDGMENT OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE
4. Th



A.K. Gopalan Vs. State of Madras
Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and others:
Pooja Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others
Pooja Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others:
Subramanian Swamy and others Vs. Raju through Member Juvenile Justice Board and another:
The right to change one's name is subject to reasonable regulations, requiring prior court declaration for validity, which was not fulfilled in this case.
The right to change one's name is recognized as a fundamental right, but requires a civil court declaration and adherence to statutory regulations.
The right to change one's name is a fundamental right, but such changes do not retroactively alter educational records reflecting past identities.
The right to change one's name or date of birth in certificates is fundamental to identity, and restrictions imposed by CBSE's Byelaws are unconstitutional if they prevent legitimate corrections post....
Action of the concerned authority, is erroneous inasmuch as, the authority is obligated to undertake the exercise laid down by the provisions of Section 15 of the Act of 1969 read with Rule 11 of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.