Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Kanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel and perused the material available on record.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel and perused the material available on record.
2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 23.07.2024 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate- Bahraich to the extent of condition(s) imposed therein while exercising power under Section 80 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006 (in short 'Code') in the case registered as Computerized Case No.T802024028697, instituted by the petitioner- Kanti Devi.
The operative portion of the order dated 23.07.2024 reads as under.
3. The underline portion of operative portion of order dated 23.07.2024, quoted above, is in issue before this Court as also was the issue before the opposite party no.2 -Additional Commissioner, (Administration), Devi Patan Division Gonda, who passed the impugned order dated 05.03.2025 in the case instituted under Section 210 of Code 2006 registered as Revision/Case No.1305 of 2024; Computerized Case No.C202408000001305 (Kanti Devi Vs. State of U.P.). Relevant portion of the
Conditions imposed under Section 80 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code must align with statutory provisions, and failure to do so results in a lack of legal authority.
The court upheld the rejection of the petitioners' application for land declaration due to lack of prior permission, emphasizing the importance of notification dates and authority discretion under th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the first appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 cannot be filed against an order passed under Section 24, and the appeal can ....
The principle of res judicata does not preclude a subsequent application for correction of land records under Section 30 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
The court ruled that an appeal under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code is subject to revision under Section 210, emphasizing the supervisory role of the Board or Commissioner over subor....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
