SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 349

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Bhuralal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
J.B. Mehta for petitioner; Valmik Sakargayen, Govt. Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 16.8.2022 passed by the Additional Collector, Indore whereby the petitioner's Revision No.4/2022-23 has been rejected only on the ground that against the impugned order dated 30.3.2022 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Depalpur, Indore which is final in nature, can be challenged only in an appeal by way of section 50(2)(a) of the Land Revenue Code., which provides that a revision is not maintainable against an appealable order.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned order before the Additional Collector was final in nature against which the only remedy available to the petitioner is by way of revision under section 50(2)(a) of the Land Revenue Code. Counsel has submitted that against the aforesaid order dated 30.3.2022 an appeal would be barred under section 46 (b) of the Land Revenue Code as the order has been passed under section 248 of the Land Acquisition Act.* Thus, it is submitted that the impugned be set aside and the matter may be remanded back to the Additional Collector to decide the same on its

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top