SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2474

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anil Kumar,Vipin Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Samit Gopal, J.

1. List revised.

2. Heard Sri Mahendra Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vipin Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on records.

3. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant- Sonu, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 67 of 2021 (S.T. No. 2279 of 2021), under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 I.P.C. Police Station Pisawa, District Aligarh.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the first information report was lodged by Saurabh Kumar nephew of the deceased Vijay Pal against Beerpal Singh, Manoj Kumar, Laturi Singh and son-in-law of Veerpal stating therein that there had been some dispute with regards to land between him and Veerpal and the accused persons have murdered his uncle Vijay Pal Singh by firing upon him. It is submitted that one alleged witness Gaurav named co-accused Dhanpal and Prashant in the present matter who were arrested and from the possession of Prashant a country-made

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top