SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 648

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Subhash Vidyarthi, J.
Sumit Singh - Applicant
Vs.
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. - Opposite Party
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 8274 of 2023
Decided On : 05-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Girish Kumar Pandey,Neeraj Kumar Mishra
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Granting bail based on lack of specific allegation, absence of criminal history, and parity with co-accused.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Assault Allegation - The court granted bail to the applicant based on lack of specific allegation against him, absence of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused with similar involvement in criminal cases had been granted bail.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application in a case involving allegations of assault under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence and false implication.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant had no criminal history, and there were only general allegations against him. It noted that co-accused with similar involvement in criminal cases had been granted bail, and the applicant had been in jail for a significant period.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail despite the allegations against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail to the applicant based on the lack of specific allegation against him, absence of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused with similar involvement in criminal cases had been granted bail.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT :

Subhash Vidyarthi, J.

1. Heard Sri Girish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ambrish Verma, learned AGA-I for the State, Sri Ram Charitra Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.

2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 0322 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 504, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Machhrehta, District Sitapur.

3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 24.10.2022 at 20:30 hrs against seven persons, including the applicant, alleging that all the accused persons had attacked the informant and his family members at about 07:30 p.m. on 24.10.2022. The FIR states that the applicant's father Siddheswar Singh had hit the informant with spade and all the other accused persons had also beaten him up.

4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has falsely been implicated in the present case and that he has no criminal history.

5. The applicant's father co-accused Siddheswar Singh has filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. regarding the same incident, which has been allowed by means of an order dated 23.12.2022 and a complaint case has been registered.

6. The applicant's father-co accused Siddheswar Singh has also suffered injuries in the incident and a copy of his injury report has been annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the bail application.

7. The co-accused-Siddheswar Singh against whom there is specific allegation of hitting with spade has already been granted bail by means of an order dated 16.01.2023 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 761 of 2023. Another co-accused Makar Singh has also been granted bail by means of an order dated 16.02.2023 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 2429 of 2023.

8. Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail application and he has submitted that Siddheswar Singh has been granted bail considering his age. He has further submitted that the applicant should not be granted bail as his father Siddheswar Singh is a history-sheeter as he has a long criminal history.

9. Siddheswar Singh has been granted bail in spite of their being a specific allegation of assault against him and in spite of his having a long criminal history. There is no specific allegation against the applicant and only general allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons except Siddheswar Singh. The case set up against the applicant is at par with that set up against co-accused Makar Singh, who has also been granted bail inspite of his involvement in other criminal cases. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 19.06.2023, without making any further observation which may affect the merit of the case, I find it a fit case for enlargement of the applicant on bail.

10. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed.

11. Let the applicant Sumit Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No. 0322 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 504, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Machhrehta, District Sitapur on furnishing a bail bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

    (i) the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

12. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top