Rajesh Kumar Sharma vs State Of U.P. - 2025 Supreme(All) 2528

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2528

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Saurabh Srivastava, J.
Rajesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Deepak Pandey, Lavlesh Kumar Sharma
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Saurabh Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Deepak Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Anand Sagar Dubey, learned AGA-I for respondent no. 1 and Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.

2. After hearing in detail, while reserving the judgment, all the learned counsels appearing for the parties were requested to submit their written arguments along with relied upon judgments within a week and the same has been received and are available in the records.

Petitioner’s submissions

3. Present writ petition has been preferred for challenging the order dated 17.05.2024 passed by learned court of Additional District and Sessions Judge-II/Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gautam Buddha Nagar through which anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been allowed and bail has been extended on certain conditions which are mentioned in the order which impugned the present petition and are five in numbers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order dated 17.05.2024 submitted that despite the bailable warrants having been issued against the respondent no. 2, the anticipatory bail application preferred at the behest of respondent no. 2 has been allowe