SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2820

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Mohammad Soheluddin – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mahesh Kumar Kuntal, Surendra Mohan Sharma

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised. As informed by learned A.G.A., notice has been served to the informant on 19.1.2025.

2. Heard Sri Mahesh Kumar Kuntal, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri D.K. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 127 of 2024, U/S 137(2), 87, 64(1) B.N.S. and 3/4(2) POCSO Act, Police Station Lohamandi, District Agra, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have enticed away the minor daughter of the informant on 6.7.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. It is stated that there is no time of offence mentioned in the FIR, as such, it seems to be delayed. The victim by her looks, seems to be major, although as per the ossification test report, her age has come up to be 17 years, as such, a leverage of two years may be granted to the applicant on the upper side.

6. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonst

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top