Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Krishna Chandra Singh @ Munna Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Rao Narendra Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present application has been filed with the prayer to direct respondent no. 2, I Additional Session Judge, Bahraich to decide Criminal Revision No. 132 of 2010 (Ramendra Singh & Ors. Vs. Jai Raj Singh & Ors.) within stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.
3. Insofar as the prayer sought in the present application is concerned, it is informed that Criminal Revision No. 132 of 2010 (supra) has already been decided by the court below vide order dated 23.07.2024 and, therefore, the application has become infructuous and is dismissed, accordingly.
4. However, looking to the genesis of the present matter, this Court on 08.07.2024 passed the following order :
“Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vinod Kumar Sahi, learned Additional Advocate General, who was called upon by this Court, assisted by Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record.
By means of this application, the applicant, who at present is aged about
The court emphasized the urgent need to increase the judge-to-population ratio to ensure timely justice and address the backlog of cases, recognizing this as a public interest issue.
Article 39A of Constitution of India provides for equal justice and free legal aid.
The court emphasized the necessity of effective implementation of judicial technology and timely execution of court processes to enhance efficiency in the judicial system.
The allocation of vacancies and creation of posts in the High Court Establishment are matters of policy within the powers of the Chief Justice and are not subject to judicial review unless they viola....
The arrest of an accused during the pendency of anticipatory bail is permissible, but it raises questions of procedural fairness and respect for court timelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
