Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Sachin – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J
1. This matter was heard by this Court on 09.01.2025. On that date following order was passed;
"1. This matter was heard by this Court on 18.12.2024. On that date several directions were issued to the district judiciary, regarding maintaining the process register as well as proper implementation of process of court which includes summons, warrants and process under Sections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C.
2. By the order dated 18.12.2024, the Deputy Director General, NIC, the Additional Director General (Technical Services), U.P. Lucknow and C.P.C., High Court Allahabad were directed to appear before this Court.
3. In pursuance of the order dated 18.12.2024, Deputy Director General, NIC, Mr. Shashikant Sharma as well as some other officers, attached to the office of Additional Director General (Technical Services), U.P. Lucknow are present through video conferencing. Apart from this, the C.P.C., High Court Allahabad along with Mr. Alok Mishra, System Analyst, High Court Allahabad is also present before this Court.
4. A letter has been received from the Superintendent of Police (Technical Services), UP, Lucknow that the Additional Director General (Technical Service
The court emphasized the necessity of effective implementation of judicial technology and timely execution of court processes to enhance efficiency in the judicial system.
Court mandates efficient execution of judicial processes under the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing police responsibility and procedural compliance for expeditious trials.
Grant of bail for non-compliance of mandate of Sections 41 and 41-A of Cr.P.C., 1973. – Directions contained in Paras 100.2, 100.4, 100.7 of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (....
The court emphasizes the necessity for compliance with directions regarding Undertrial Prisoners and the implementation of Standard Operating Procedures as per established legal precedents.
The court emphasized the urgent need to increase the judge-to-population ratio to ensure timely justice and address the backlog of cases, recognizing this as a public interest issue.
The court emphasized the necessity for accountability and efficiency in the e-filing system for charge sheets, directing both police and courts to address discrepancies and enhance operations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict compliance with the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and circulars to expedite trials, prevent delays, and ensure timely appe....
Court mandates pilot implementation of software module automating premature release processes for eligible life convicts, enforcing timelines, alerts, and accountability to eliminate administrative d....
The court emphasized police accountability and mandated the implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure to ensure compliance with court orders and timely investigations.
Prolonged custody without trial justifies bail under Article 21, emphasizing the necessity of timely prosecution to uphold fundamental rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
