IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
Sachin – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32881 of 2024
Decided on : 31-01-2025
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 82 & 83 - Implementation of court processes - Directions issued for maintaining process registers and proper execution of summons and warrants - Technical issues regarding NSTEP and National Prisoner Information Portal addressed - Assurance given for training of judicial officers and advocates on new technology. (Paras 1-21)
(B) Judicial Administration - Need for timely execution of court processes and addressing staff shortages in district courts highlighted - Recommendations for creation of additional posts in district courts pending since 1989. (Paras 15-17)
Facts of the case:
The court addressed issues regarding the implementation of NSTEP and the National Prisoner Information Portal, with various officials present to discuss technical challenges and training needs.
Findings of Court:
The court emphasized the need for effective implementation of technology in judicial processes and directed relevant authorities to ensure compliance and training.
Issues: The main issues included the effectiveness of NSTEP, the execution of court processes, and the need for additional staff in district courts.
Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the importance of timely communication of court orders to prison authorities and the necessity of training for judicial officers to enhance efficiency.
Result: Directions issued for compliance and further hearings scheduled.
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J
1. This matter was heard by this Court on 09.01.2025. On that date following order was passed;
"1. This matter was heard by this Court on 18.12.2024. On that date several directions were issued to the district judiciary, regarding maintaining the process register as well as proper implementation of process of court which includes summons, warrants and process under Sections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C.
2. By the order dated 18.12.2024, the Deputy Director General, NIC, the Additional Director General (Technical Services), U.P. Lucknow and C.P.C., High Court Allahabad were directed to appear before this Court.
3. In pursuance of the order dated 18.12.2024, Deputy Director General, NIC, Mr. Shashikant Sharma as well as some other officers, attached to the office of Additional Director General (Technical Services), U.P. Lucknow are present through video conferencing. Apart from this, the C.P.C., High Court Allahabad along with Mr. Alok Mishra, System Analyst, High Court Allahabad is also present before this Court.
4. A letter has been received from the Superintendent of Police (Technical Services), UP, Lucknow that the Additional Director General (Technical Services), U.P. Lucknow is not well and he is advised by the doctor for taking bed rest from 8.1.2024 to 14.1.2025 and for that reason he could not personally attend the Court through video conferencing.
5. This Court also heard Sri Dilip Kr. Pandey as a representative of the Bar of High Court Allahabad, regarding problems of the members of the Bar, facing with new technology which requires proper training of the private as well as government advocates.
6. This Court has also received certain suggestions from the Incharge District Judge, Shamli as well as other judicial officers at Shamli through video conferencing on 8.1.2025 and they informed that in the District Court, Shamli all the processes of the criminal courts are being sent through NSTEP and that system has been properly working except some minor issues.
7. Mr. Shashikant Sharma, Deputy Director General, NIC, has assured the Court that he will rectify all the technical issues within the next two weeks. It is also informed by Mr. Sharma that certain issues like non-availability of facility of taking thumb impression of the person, to whom the process of the court has to be served, is being rectified with the help of police. It is further informed by him that an NIC team is working for proper utilization of the National Prisoner Information Portal and right now the access to the same has been given to the Advocate General of the States who can see several services provided at this portal. It is further informed that any person, whether a relative or an advocate of the prisoners, can avail these facilities available on National Prisoner Information Portal, which also includes custody certificate, after getting registered with the consent of the prisoner.
8. Mr. Sharma further assured that an NIC team will also visit Allahabad to train all the State Government Advocates as well as advocates for the Union of India so that they could be aware of the technical part of the NSTEP, ICJS and other technicalities.
9. A fact came into the knowledge of this Court, on apprisal of Mr. Sharma, that though the National Prisoner Information Portal has been very effectively working in Delhi and Rajasthan, it is not working properly in U.P. Therefore, the Director General (Prison), U.P. is directed to look into the issue and also to take advice, if necessary, from the NIC for proper implementation of National Prisoner Information Portal so that the facilities, available on that portal, can be availed by the relatives or advocates of the prisoners.
10. It is also informed by Mr. Sharma, Deputy Director General (NIC), that though the NSTEP has been effectively implemented in District Shamli, but it is not working properly in Ghaziabad, Allahabad and Lucknow as the police as well as district courts are not showing their intere




The court emphasized the necessity of effective implementation of judicial technology and timely execution of court processes to enhance efficiency in the judicial system.
Court mandates efficient execution of judicial processes under the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing police responsibility and procedural compliance for expeditious trials.
Grant of bail for non-compliance of mandate of Sections 41 and 41-A of Cr.P.C., 1973. – Directions contained in Paras 100.2, 100.4, 100.7 of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (....
The court emphasizes the necessity for compliance with directions regarding Undertrial Prisoners and the implementation of Standard Operating Procedures as per established legal precedents.
The court emphasized the urgent need to increase the judge-to-population ratio to ensure timely justice and address the backlog of cases, recognizing this as a public interest issue.
The court emphasized the necessity for accountability and efficiency in the e-filing system for charge sheets, directing both police and courts to address discrepancies and enhance operations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict compliance with the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and circulars to expedite trials, prevent delays, and ensure timely appe....
Court mandates pilot implementation of software module automating premature release processes for eligible life convicts, enforcing timelines, alerts, and accountability to eliminate administrative d....
The court emphasized police accountability and mandated the implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure to ensure compliance with court orders and timely investigations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.