SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Shivam Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ganesh Mani

JUDGMENT :

Manju Rani Chauhan, J.

1. List has been revised. None is present on behalf of opposite party no. 2, though learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Satendra Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application u/s 482 has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 55 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 41 of 2020, under sections 498A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District-Amroha, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/J.M./FTC-2, Amroha as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 25.3.2022 on the basis of compromise.

3. On 13.10.2024, the following order was passed:-

1. Mr. Ashish Srivastava, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 in Court today, which is taken on record. Office is directed to register the same.

2. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Mr. Triloki Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State and perused the rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top