IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Rajeev Misra, J.
Neeraj Kumar Manjhi - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Application U/s 482 No. 37499 of 2024
Decided On : 06-02-2025
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 5 and 6 - Quashing of proceedings - Applicant, a charge sheeted accused, sought to quash proceedings of Special Session Trial No.267 of 2023 pending under IPC and POCSO Act, citing subsequent marriage to the prosecutrix and the birth of their child as grounds for quashing - The court noted that the prosecutrix was a minor at the time of the alleged offenses, thus raising legal concerns regarding the validity of the marriage and the criminality of the accused - The court referred to K. Dhandapani Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, 2022 SCC Online SC 1056, where similar circumstances led to quashing of proceedings due to subsequent developments - The court found that the criminality, if any, was washed away by the marriage and the formation of a family, thus allowing the application. (Paras 1-14)
(B) Criminal Proceedings - The court emphasized that subsequent developments, such as marriage and childbirth, may impact the continuation of criminal proceedings, particularly where they may disrupt family life. (Para 10)
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Misra, J.
1. Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Rahul Yadav, the learned counsel representing victim-opposite party-5.
2. Perused the record.
3. Applicant-Neeraj Kumar Manjhi, who is a charge sheeted accused, has approached this Court by means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:-
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Special Session Trial No. 267 of 2023 (State Vs. Neeraj Kumar Manjhi) pending in the court of Special Judge POCSO Act, Allahabad arising out of case crime No.360 of 2022 u/s 363, 366, 376, 328 I.P.C. and section 5/6 POCSO Act as well as charge sheet dated 15.02.2023 submitted in case crime No.360 of 2022 u/s 363, 366, 376, 328 I.P.C. and section 5/6 POCSO Act Police Station Shankargarh. District Prayagraj and also quash the summoning order dated 14.09.2023 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act, Allahabad in the aforesaid case.
It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Special Session Trial No.267 of 2023 pending in the court of Special Judge POCSO Act, Allahabad arising out of case crime No.360 of 2022 u/s 363, 366, 376, 328 I.P.C. and section 5/6 POCSO Act as well as summoning order dated 14.09.2023 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act, Allahabad in the aforesaid case.
And or pass such other and further order may deem fit and proper, otherwise the Applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."
4. On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. submits that notice of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been served upon first informant-opposite party-2 on 31.10.2024. However, in spite of service of notice, neither any counter affidavit has been filed by first informant-opposite party-2 nor anyone has put in appearance on his behalf to oppose this application, even in revised call.
5. Learned counsel for applicant submits that though applicant is a named and charge sheeted accused and facing trial before Court below but in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as have emerged on record, the present application is liable to be allowed.
6. In furtherance of aforesaid submission, the learned counsel for applicant submits that subsequent to the FIR dated 02.12.2022, lodged by first informant-opposite party-2 Guddu Nishad (brother of the prosecutrix), the prosecutrix solemnized marriage with applicant on 15.12.2022. As such, the prosecutrix became the legally wedded wife of applicant. In view of above, the prosecutrix started residing with the applicant as his legally wedded wife. The marriage of the parties has also been registered under the provisions of the U.P. Registration of Marriage Rules, 2017. Photocopy of the marriage registration certificate has been brought on record as Annexure-SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. It is thus urged by the learned counsel for applicant that since the marriage of the parties has been registered, therefore, there is a legal presumption regarding valid marriage of the parties. Learned counsel for applicant further submits that from the aforesaid wedlock of the prosecutrix with the applicant, a son namely Riyansh was born. The birth certificate of the child is on record as Annexure-1 to the affidavit filed by the victim opposite party-5. As per the said certificate, the applicant Neeraj Kumar Manjhi is shown as the father, whereas the prosecutrix is shown as the mother. The bona-fides of the parties is further evident from the fact that the prosecutrix has joined the present proceedings by filing an affidavit supporting the present application. On the above conspectus, the learned counsel for applicant submits that in view of the subsequent developments that have taken place, the criminality, if any, committed by applicant stands washed of. As such, no useful purpose shall be serve
Subsequent marriage and childbirth can impact the continuation of criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, particularly when the prosecutrix was a minor at the time of the alleged offenses.
Subsequent marriage and family formation can quash criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, but compromise in sexual offence cases is not permissible.
Subsequent marriage of an accused to the victim can result in quashing of criminal proceedings, emphasizing family integrity over prosecution, even when the victim was a minor at the time of the offe....
Subsequent marriage between the accused and prosecutrix negates the criminality alleged, warranting quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The court held that marriage between the accused and the victim, along with their living together, can quash criminal proceedings under POCSO, reaffirming the principle that continued prosecution in ....
A marriage between the accused and victim can be grounds to quash a FIR for rape under certain circumstances, emphasizing the balance between justice and social welfare.
Quashing criminal proceedings is justifiable when the parties have reconciled and married, reflecting societal approval and rendering continuation of the trial an abuse of process.
Victims' consent and absence of coercion voids charges of kidnapping and sexual assault if sufficient evidence of mutual marriage exists, emphasizing personal liberties and maturity under statutory l....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.