SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Shiva – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajnath Yadav

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Varma, J.

1. Heard counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

2. This application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 187 of 2024, under Sections 304, 504 and 34 I.P.C., Police Station Jalalpur, District Jaunpur.

3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report. As per the allegations in the first information report, the co-accused Sunil Sonkar and other unknown persons are alleged to have assaulted the brother of the informant. According to post-mortem report the deceased received a single injury on his head. After almost one month of the alleged incident the name of the applicant was disclosed by the son of the deceased Himanshu and two persons namely Manjoor Alam @ Firoz and Uma Sonkar. It is contended that the said statements are an afterthought. Further, there are vague and general allegations against the applicant. The author of single injury on the head of the deceased is not known. The named co-accused Sunil Sonkar has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 8.11.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top