Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Urban Development Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Abdul Moin, J.
1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Shri Jitendra Singh and Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsels for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Shri Rishabh Kapoor, Shri Madhav Om, Advocate holding brief of Shri Samir Om and Shri Ankit Singh, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the Jal Nigam.
2. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the contesting parties contend that the issue involved in all the aforesaid writ petitions is same. As such, the Court proceeds to hear and decide all the writ petitions together by a common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts of WRIT - A No. - 17904 of 2020 are being taken into consideration.
3. Instant writ petition (WRIT - A No. - 17904 of 2020) has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:-
"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 18.08.2020 passed by the Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2 contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.
(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 20.08.2020 passed by the Opposite Party No. 4 contained as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petiti
The court affirmed that no vested rights arise from erroneous retrospective regularization, and recovery from Class-IV employees for excess payments is impermissible under the law.
The right to pension is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away without due process, and similarly situated employees must be treated equally under the law.
The court established that eligibility for regularization and pensionary benefits must be determined based on the criteria set forth in applicable regulations, and that such benefits cannot be claime....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of pensionary benefits for employees appointed prior to a certain date and subsequently regularized, as well as the requirement to ....
The court affirmed that employees continuing post-2016 have a right to regularization, and termination orders must be based on valid grounds.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
