SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2992

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VINOD DIWAKAR
Bacchi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjeev Kumar Yadav

Table of Content
1. understanding of the applicant's case against the allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. liability for selling counterfeit goods. (Para 3 , 4)
3. discussion on legal grounds for dismissing charges. (Para 5)
4. concerns over judicial custody and immediate trials. (Para 6 , 8)
5. examination of procedural deficiencies in bail applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. reaffirmation of existing judicial principles on anticipatory bail. (Para 20)
7. anticipatory bail jurisprudence and its legal framework. (Para 21 , 22 , 25 , 30)
8. upholding the right to liberty via effective bail guidelines. (Para 36 , 38)
9. procedural directives regarding bail submissions. (Para 49 , 50)
10. conclusion allowing the applicant to proceed without arrest. (Para 52)

JUDGMENT :

Vinod Diwakar, J.

1. Heard Shri Satyaveer Singh, learned Amicus Curiae, along with learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent, and perused the material available on record.

2. The applicant has challenged the summoning order dated 29.04.2022 passed in Case No. 10849 of 2022, which is pending trial before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur. The applicant has also prayed to quash the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top