IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Manish Kumar Nigam, J.
Ankit Suman - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Respondents
Matters Under Article 227 No. - 8704 of 2025
Decided On : 07-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed to set aside family court order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument regarding maintenance during stay. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. exposition on section 24 of hindu marriage act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. clarification on the scope of maintenance under section 24. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. judicial interpretation of proceedings under section 24. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. section 24 application maintainable amid other proceedings. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. key cases supporting ongoing maintenance claims. (Para 18) |
| 8. continuance of payment liability under supreme court order. (Para 19) |
| 9. maintenance obligations persist during transfer proceedings. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 06.05.2025 passed by Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Pilibhit in Execution Case No. 9 of 2022 (Smt. Neeraj Saini Vs. Ankit Suman).
2. Brief facts of the case are that the husband-petitioner filed a petition on 20.07.2018 seeking divorce from his wife-respondent No. 2 before the Judge, Family Court under Section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955. The aforesaid case was numbered as Case No. 286 of 2018. The respondent-wife appeared and filed written statement denying the allegations made by the petitioner. During pendency of this petition, an application under Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 was filed by respondent No. 2 on 26.03.2019 to which the petitioner filed objections on 01.10.2019. The said application under Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT was decided by the order dated 30.10.2020 dismissing the application filed by the wife-respondent No.2. The order dated 30.10.2020 was challenged by the wife-respondent No. 2 by filing First Appeal No. 722 of 2021 before this Court. The judgment and order dated 30.10.2020 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Pilibhit was set aside and the application filed by respondent No. 2 under Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT was allowed on 18.11.2021 by this Court and awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month to the wife and Rs. 10,000/- to the minor daughter payable with effect from date of application. It was further directed that the arrears of maintenance shall be paid to the wife within a period of two months. The wife was held to be entitled for the cost of litigation incurred by her both before this Court and the Family Court and a lump sum Rs. 30,000/- was directed towards cost of litigation which was to be paid within one month from the date of judgment. Order passed by this Court dated 18.11.2021 was challenged by the petitioner before Supreme Court and the Supreme Court by its order dated 29.11.2022 directed for payment of maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- to wife and Rs. 5,000/- per month to the minor daughter. Respondent No. 2 filed execution case No. 9 of 2022 for executing the order passed under Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Pilibhit. An application Paper No. 45 Ga was filed by the wife-respondent No. 2 with the averment that till 26.08.2024, the petitioner was liable to pay Rs. 2,50,000/- to respondent No. 2 which was not paid by the petitioner and respondent No. 2 prayed that the said amount be recovered from the petitioner. By order dated 11.09.2024, recovery warrant was issued against the petitioner and therefore, the impugned order dated 06.05.2025 was passed by the Additional Family Court, Pilibhit issuing recovery against the petitioner.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the provisions of Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955, maintenance can only be granted pendente lite the proceedings. It has been further submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the respondent- wife has filed a petition before this Court for transferring the divorce petition from Pilibhit to Bareilly and this Court has stayed the further proceedings o
Surendra Kumar Asthana Vs. Kamlesh Asthana
Yogeshwar Prasad Vs. Jyoti Rani Prasad
Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South India Trust Association CSI CINOD Secretariat, Madras
Maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act continues during stayed proceedings, ensuring financial support for legal actions, thus the liability for payment is unaffected.
The court emphasized that proceedings for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act must take precedence to ensure subsistence for dependent spouses during ongoing divorce litiga....
The duty of the Family Court to dispose of applications for maintenance and litigation expenses under Sec. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act within the stipulated time period to provide monetary assistanc....
A wife can claim maintenance under various statutes, but the total amount awarded must consider previous payments to avoid unjust enrichment and double liabilities.
The Court upheld the principle that maintenance pendente lite may be granted based on a comparative assessment of both parties' incomes under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
The court reaffirmed the necessity of financial support for a dependent spouse during proceedings, emphasizing the discretion courts have in evaluating alimony based on financial circumstances.
Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the court must have regard to the income of the parties before making an order for maintenance pendente lite.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.