SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2293

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
NUPUR BHATI
Kamli, W/o. Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Gurjar, S/o. Ram Lal Gurjar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Gopal Sandu.
For the Respondents: Mr. O.P. Joshi.

ORDER :

NUPUR BHATI, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:

“a) Direct that the impugned order dated 04.09.2025 (Annex.6) be quashed and set aside,

b) Direct that the proceedings in Case No. 275/2024 filed. by the Respondent under Section 13 (1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Learned Family Court, Merta be decided only after deciding the Case No. 17/2025 filed by the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 pending before the Learned Family Court, Merta,

c) Grant such further relief(s) which in the facts and circumstances of this case may do complete justice to the petitioner; and

d) Costs of the writ petition be awarded to the petitioner.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and the Respondent were married as per Hindu rites and customs. Subsequently, disputes arose between them, whereupon the Respondent filed an application for divorce on 29.11.2024, being Case No.275/2024 before the Learned Family Court, Merta (“Trial Court”) under Sections 13 (1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (“the Act of 1955”), based on false and misrepresented facts. The Petitioner filed her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top