JUDGMENT :

Irshad Ali, J.

1. Vide order dated 6.8.2025, the review application was allowed, which is being quoted below :-

" IA No.1 of 2024- Delay Application

1. Heard.

2. In paragraph-2 of the objection filed, objection has been raised, which has no merit. The reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application are sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the review application is condoed.

Review Application

1. Heard Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This review application has been filed for review of judgment and order dated 14.2.2023, passed in Writ-A No.2823 of 2004.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that at no point of time, correct facts were brought into the notice of the Court, neither the validity of the appointment was shown by the respondent/ petitioner, therefore, writ of mandamus cannot be issued for the payment of salary to the respondent/ petitioner from the State exchequer. He next submitted that once the institution has been upgraded to high school and intermediate, the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act,