HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J
Gaurav Sharma - Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. and another –Respondent
APPLICATION U/S 482 NO. 4834, 6746 OF 2022
Decided on : 25-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of complaints under n.i. act. (Para 2) |
| 2. details of second complaint under n.i. act. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments against the complaints under n.i. act. (Para 4) |
| 4. opposite party's arguments regarding the legality of cheques. (Para 6) |
| 5. context for legally enforceable debt. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. interpretation of mou clauses regarding debt. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. relevance of previous judgments. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. court's conclusion on enforceability of debt. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. final order and dismissal of applications. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
1. As in both the cases, common questions of fact and law arises between the same parties with regard to same subject matter, therefore, above noted cases are being decided by a common judgment.
Brief facts of Application U/S 482 No. 4834 of 2022
2. The Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 114 of 2020 ( Gaurav Sharma Vs. Ankit Agarwal ) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, (hereinafter referred as “N.I. Act”), Police Station-Tajganj, District Agra, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 22.02.2021 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra.
2(i) Complaint Case No. 114 of 2020 has been filed alleging that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 had been running a partnership business by the name of Bankey Bihari Vidhya Mandir and the opposite party no. 2 decided to end the partnership and withdraw his share, in pursuance thereof, it was decided that a sum of Rs. 38,95,193/- would be paid by the applicant. It is further alleged that a cheque bearing no. 105359 dated 25.9.2020 had been issued by the applicant in favour of the opposite party no. 2 and when the same was placed before the Bank on 05.10.2020, the same was dishonoured on 5.10.2020 due to insufficient funds as well as stop payment by applicant.
2(ii). The opposite party no. 2 informed the applicant regarding the said dishonour of cheque and thereafter one legal notice dated 14.10.2020 had been sent to the applicant by his counsel through registered post and was duly served to the applicant on 17.10.2020, since then no payment was made. Hence, impugned complaint dated 17.11.2020 has been filed against the applicant.
Brief facts of Application U/S 482 No. 6746 of 2022
3. The Application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 113 of 2020 (Ashish Agarwal Vs. Gaurav Sharma) under Section 138 of N.I. Act, Police Station-Tajganj, District Agra, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 22.02.2021 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra.
3(i). Complaint Case No. 113 of 2020 has been filed alleging that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 had been running a partnership business by the name of Bankey Bihari Vidhya Mandir and the opposite party no. 2 decided to end the partnership and withdraw his share, in pursua nce thereof, it was decided that a sum of Rs. 58,00,000/- would be paid by the applicant. It is further alleged that a cheque bearing no. 105358 dated 25.9.2020 of Rs. 58,00,000/- had been issued by the applicant in favour of the opposite party no. 2 and when the same was placed before the Bank on 30.09.2020, it was dishonoured on 30.9.2020 due to insufficient funds as well as stop payment by applicant.
3(ii). The opposite party no. 2 informed the applicant regarding the said dishonour of cheque and thereafter one legal notice dated 14.10.2020 has been sent to the applicant by his counsel through registered post, which has been duly served to the applicant on 17.10.2020, since then no payment was made. Hence, impugned complaint dated 17.11.2020 has been filed against the applicant.
Arguments on behalf of the applicant
4. Learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned complaints have been filed on the basis of f
The court determined that a legally enforceable debt existed at the time of the cheque's issuance, validating the complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
A cheque issued as security does not create criminal liability under Section 138 unless there is a legally enforceable debt at the time of its issuance.
A legally enforceable debt must exist at the time of cheque presentation for liability under Section 138 of the N.I. Act to arise.
Obligations under a Memorandum of Understanding can establish legally enforceable debt, relevant to Section 138 of the NI Act.
Point of law: Question whether a post-dated cheque is for “discharge of debt or liability” depends on the nature of the transaction.
Dishonour of cheque – If drawer of cheque pays a part or whole of sum between period when cheque is drawn and when it is encashed upon maturity, then legally enforceable debt on date of maturity woul....
The issuance of a cheque signifies a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, and the burden to prove otherwise lies with the accused, not the complainant.
Accused failed to rebut the presumption of debt under Section 139, leading to acquittal being upheld despite dishonoured cheques. Evidence must sufficiently support claims of payment to avoid prosecu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.