Mahendra Singh VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GAJENDRA KUMAR
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Vikas Sharma.
For the Opposite Parties : G.A., Sudhir Dixit, Utkarsh Dixit.

Table of Content
1. factual background establishes the case and involved parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court observations analyze witness testimonies and evidence. (Para 8 , 10 , 15 , 17 , 41 , 44 , 48)
3. arguments against the lower court's application under section 319 cr.p.c. (Para 12 , 14)
4. ratio decidendi concerning the requirements for summoning under section 319 cr.p.c. (Para 16 , 18 , 37)
5. conclusion of the court dismissing the revision. (Para 49)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Vikas Sharma, learned counsel for revisionist, learned counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record.

2. This criminal revision has been filed challenging order dated 13.05.2022, passed by learned court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bulandshahar, in Sessions Trial No.660 of 2020 ( State Vs. Hemant ), under Section 302 IPC, Police Station-Araniya, District Bulandshahar, arising out of Case Crime No.313 of 2019, whereby application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., filed by first informant/opposite party-2 Raj Kumar has been allowed. Consequently, applicant has been summoned to face trial in above mentioned case.

3. From perusal of the records, it is evident that in respect of an inci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GAJENDRA KUMARMahendra Singh – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (23)

GAJENDRA KUMAR
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent