Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Rajesh Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Lal Jeswani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and succession in property disputes (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 2. tenancy rights and implications of deceased owner (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. impact of legal actions on property rights (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. res judicata in property law (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 5. judicial authority and finality of decrees (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Jain, J.
1. First Appeal no. 60 of 2011 has been filed by the plaintiff – appellant against judgment and decree dated 9.12.2010 passed by the court of Sri. Rajat Singh Jain, Additional District Judge/Special Judge(EC Act), Jhansi in O.S. no. 129 of 2005 Rajesh Chhabra versus Radhey Lal Jeswani and others, whereby the plaintiffs suit for the relief of declaration, for declaring void agreement to sell dated 20.4.2005, executed by defendant no.2 &3, in favour of defendant no.1, regarding bungalow no. 329, Jhokan Bagh, Jhansi and suit for the relief of permanent injunction, for restraining the defendants from demolishing, alienating, transferring, altering the above bungalow, has been rejected.
2. First appeal No. 70 of 2011 has been filed by the plaintiff – appellant against
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
