Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajay Bhanot
Aftab Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and requested reliefs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's lack of standing and delay. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. importance of service rules and roles. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conditions for maintaining writ petitions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. judicial principle against frivolous litigation. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. conclusion and penalty for the petitioner. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Ajay Bhanot, J.
1. Heard Shri Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner, Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No. 1 to 4 and Shri Madan Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents No. 5 and 6.
2. Petitioner is before this Court with following principal reliefs:-
"A. Issue a writ or direction or order in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to decide the complaints of the petitioner dated 04.05.2016 (Annexure-2), 10.10.2024 (Annexure-3) and 13.11.2024 (Annexure-6), within time specified by this Hon'ble Court.
B. Issue a writ or direction or order in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to take appropriate action against in pursuance to the complaints of the petitioner dated 04.05.2016 (Ann
A petitioner must establish locus standi and be an aggrieved party to maintain a challenge in court, particularly in service matters, where public interest litigations are discouraged.
Public interest litigation is not maintainable in service matters; only aggrieved parties can invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The court ruled that a third party lacks locus standi to appeal an employment decision unless they can demonstrate direct and substantial legal injury. The right to appeal is confined to aggrieved pa....
The High Court held that litigants must approach Administrative Tribunals first for recruitment-related matters, as exclusive jurisdiction was conferred under the Administrative Tribunals Act, even f....
It is no doubt true that the strict rules of locus standi are relaxed to an extent in a quo warranto proceedings. Nonetheless an imposter coming before the Court invoking public law remedy at the han....
Compassionate appointments are concessions, not rights; delay in filing petitions undermines legal claims.
The appointing authority should provide legally acceptable justifiable reasons for non-appointment of candidates in the waiting list, and the inaction in filling up vacant posts without justifiable r....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
