IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH
ARUN BHANSALI, CJ, JASPREET SINGH
Niraj Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar Mishra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in filing appeal (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. preliminary objection raised on maintainability of appeal (Para 2 , 5 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. discussion on locus standi and aggrieved party (Para 6 , 9 , 15 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. legal standing and rights of a third party in appeal (Para 24 , 39 , 41) |
| 5. third party cannot challenge employee's dismissal order (Para 50 , 54) |
| 6. dismissal of special appeal for lack of standing (Para 56) |
JUDGMENT :
JASPREET SINGH, J.
I.A. No. 1 of 2024
1. The instant special appeal has been filed by Niraj Kumar Singh alongwith an application seeking leave of the Court to appeal and it is also accompanied by another application bearing I.A. No.1 of 2024 seeking condonation of delay as the office has reported the appeal to be barred by limitation by 63 days.
2. Shri Jaideep Narain Mathur, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Srideep Chatterjee, learned counsel for the writ petitioner/respondent has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the instant appeal at the behest of the appellant Niraj Kumar Singh. This objection shall be considered a little later.
3. However, first it will be appropriate to consider the application seeking
Prem Singh and Others v. Haryana State Electricity Board and others
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar
Hari Bansh Lal v. Sahodar Prasad Mahto and others
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra and others
The court ruled that a third party lacks locus standi to appeal an employment decision unless they can demonstrate direct and substantial legal injury. The right to appeal is confined to aggrieved pa....
No right to change compassionate appointment from daily wage Class-IV to Class-III post after policy-compliant acceptance; barred by unchallenged policy, lack of parity with regular employee dependen....
Delay in filing a writ petition can bar claims for relief, especially in service matters, as established by the principles of delay and laches.
The court affirmed that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy exists, particularly in private employment disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.