Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Saral Srivastava
Aaghaz Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Saral Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ashish Singh and Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsels for the respondents.
2. The petitioners are the students of M.B.B.S. Course of K.M. (Krishna Mohan) University, Mathura (hereinafter referred to as 'College') and have been admitted to the M.B.B.S. First Year Course during the Academic Session 2019-20.
3. The petitioners by means of the present writ petition have assailed the order dated 24.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority, U.P. Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) by which, the Appellate Authority has set aside the Government Orders dated 14.07.2017 and 01.07.2019, and referred the matter to the Fee Fixation Committee to determine the fee for the Session 2019-20.
4. The facts, in brief, are that petitioners participated in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test-2019 (hereinafter referred to as 'NEET') conducted by the National Testing Agency (N.T.A.). All the petitioners qualified the NEET Examination. Thereaft
Court found that a medical college's appeal against earlier fee fixation orders lacked transparency and procedural integrity due to undisclosed prior litigation, ultimately affirming the initially se....
The court established that delays in seeking relief under Article 226 do not bar claims when fundamental rights are violated, especially in cases involving mistakes or fraud.
Once the fee is determined under Section 10(3) of the Act of 2007, the same is to remain intact for the period of three years and the students who have taken admission on the basis of such fees deter....
The impugned Government order was illegal and arbitrary as it was issued in exercise of power under Section 7 of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitati....
The respondents could not impose the conditions under the impugned clauses 10, 13, 21, and 22 while approving the fee structure in the petitioners' institute, as the conditions were not lawful and we....
Regulation of fee is within domain of Committee for fixation of fee which shall ensure that fee is non-exploitative and reasonable. Right conferred on institutions to fix fee for professional courses....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
