Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Saral Srivastava
Aaghaz Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and facts surrounding fee fixation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. details of earlier writ petition challenging fee fixation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments regarding maintainability and concealment by the college. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. arguments from the respondents about the fee fixation process. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. discussion about the student's undertakings and their implications. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. court observations leading to a ruling on fee fixation. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. review of dismissals and statutory appeal processes. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. concluding arguments on appeal grounds. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. concealment of facts by college in multiple appeals. (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 10. final judgment and orders granted by the court. (Para 80) |
JUDGMENT :
Saral Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ashish Singh and Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsels for the respondents.
2. The petitioners are the students of M.B.B.S. Course of
Court found that a medical college's appeal against earlier fee fixation orders lacked transparency and procedural integrity due to undisclosed prior litigation, ultimately affirming the initially se....
The court established that delays in seeking relief under Article 226 do not bar claims when fundamental rights are violated, especially in cases involving mistakes or fraud.
Once the fee is determined under Section 10(3) of the Act of 2007, the same is to remain intact for the period of three years and the students who have taken admission on the basis of such fees deter....
The impugned Government order was illegal and arbitrary as it was issued in exercise of power under Section 7 of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitati....
The respondents could not impose the conditions under the impugned clauses 10, 13, 21, and 22 while approving the fee structure in the petitioners' institute, as the conditions were not lawful and we....
Regulation of fee is within domain of Committee for fixation of fee which shall ensure that fee is non-exploitative and reasonable. Right conferred on institutions to fix fee for professional courses....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
