SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Anupam Shukla Alias Anupama Tripathi – Appellant 
Versus 
State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Up At Lko – Respondent  
Criminal misc. Bail application No.38698 of 2024
Decided on : 06-12-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Utsav
For the Opposite Party : G.A.,K.K.Rao,Pradeep Kumar Srinette

The court denied bail based on the applicant's extensive criminal history and the absence of reasonable grounds to believe the applicant would not commit further offences if released.

Headnote:(A) Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 19(4) - Bail application - Applicant denied bail due to involvement in organized crime and history of similar offences - Allegations supported by prior criminal history and ongoing investigations - Court found no reasonable grounds to believe applicant would not commit further offences if released - Bail application rejected. (Paras 2, 3, 9, 10)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - The court emphasized the necessity of satisfying the conditions set forth under the U.P. Gangsters Act for granting bail, specifically the requirement of showing reasonable grounds for not being guilty of the alleged offence. (Paras 29, 30)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested under the U.P. Gangsters Act, accused of operating a gang involved in extortion and other criminal activities. The applicant's previous criminal history includes multiple cases of similar nature.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the applicant posed a risk of continuing criminal activity and did not meet the bail conditions specified in the U.P. Gangsters Act.

Issues: The main issues were the applicant's criminal history and whether there were reasonable grounds to grant bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's ongoing criminal activities and history of similar offences justified the denial of bail, emphasizing the need for stringent conditions under the U.P. Gangsters Act.

Result: Bail application rejected.

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Srivastava, J.

1.Heard Shri Utsav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State- respondents, Shri K. K. Rao, learned counsel for the informant in predicate offence and perused the record.

2. The present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of applicant Anupam Shukla Alias Anupama Tripathi under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. 339 of 2024, under Sections 2, 3(1) Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Prayagraj, during pendency of the trial.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Present case has been imposed upon the applicant on the basis of solitary case mentioned in the Gang Chart. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation against the applicant is that the applicant along with co-accused Apurva Sonkar is operating a gang and the applicant is a member of the said Gang and is habitual to commit offence under Chapter 17 and 22 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to the prosecution story, the complainant has lodged a criminal case, being Case Crime No. 340 of 2023 under Section 386 against the applicant with the allegation that threats were extended to the complainant for illegal demand of money. The applicant had challenged the aforesaid FIR before this Court, in which interim protection was granted to the applicant by this Hon'ble Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though this Court had granted interim protection to the applicant, but the Investigating Officer illegally arrested the applicant and sent her to jail. Thereafter, applicant moved bail application before this Court and she was enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is having criminal history of four cases including the present case. All the FIRs were lodged against the applicant with mala fide intention for the purpose of harassment. It is next submitted that there is also no possibility of the applicant either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. The applicant, who is languishing in jail since 4.9.2024 undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.

4. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.

5. Shri K. K. Rao, learned counsel for the informant in predicate offence has also vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits as under:-

(i) that the Applicant is a habitual offender and similar nature of crimes are being committed by the applicant and other gang members. Applicant being a lady is taking the benefit of being a woman by lodging false F.I.R. under section 376 I.P.C. against the innocent and respectful persons of the society. Applicant and other gang members whenever found that the investigation is not concluded in their favour, they use to given application U/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the investigating officer of that case.

(ii) that section 2(b) of the Uttar Pradesh gangsters and anti-social activities (prevention) act, 1986 defines the term "Gang" means a group of persons, who acting either singly or collectively, by violence, or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion or otherwise with the object of disturbing public order or of gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage for himself or any other person, indulge in anti-social activities. Applicant and other co- accused persons operate an organized gang and commit offences punishable under Indian penal code. The very purpose of the gang is to ill financial gains by committing innumerable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top