SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Neela Gokhale, J.
Akashdeep Karaj Singh - Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Bail Application No.3679 of 2025
Decided On : 09-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Abhishek Yende a/w Ms. Surbhi Agrawal, Mr. Shubham Kahite & Mr. Sagar P.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mahesh Mule, SPP a/w Mr. Parth Gawde & Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP
Mr. Pradip Gharat a/w Mr. Trivankumar Karnani, Ms. Hritika Jannawar & Mr. Sumit Jadhav for Intervenor.
API- Ramdas Kadam a/w ACP- Sadanand Rane, DCB CID, is present.

MCOCA Section 21(4) bail denied only if reasonable grounds beyond prima facie establish guilt; calls, photos, unlinked deposits insufficient absent confession mention or proven syndicate nexus.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Section 21(4) - Bail application in organised crime case involving murder - Stringent twin conditions: reasonable grounds for believing accused not guilty and not likely to commit offence while on bail - Prosecution case rests on two calls via hotspot to co-accused, unidentified international calls, photos with firearms, unlinked money deposit - No mention of applicant in co-accused confessional statements detailing roles - Calls alone insufficient without proven knowledge of syndicate activities - Firearm photo not connected to offence weapons - Applicant young with no antecedents - Bail granted notwithstanding offence seriousness. (Paras 9-14, 18-19)

(B) Bail under special statutes like MCOCA - Court probes deeper into material justifying conviction - Findings tentative, based on broad probabilities - Considers offence nature, evidence character, accused circumstances, presence risk, witness tampering, public interest - "Reasonable grounds" means substantial probable causes beyond prima facie. (Paras 15-17)

Facts of the case:
Applicant arraigned as accused no.24 in murder FIR under penal laws and arms regulations, later invoking organised crime provisions after approvals - Apprehended shooters caught fleeing with firearms - Syndicate alleged continuously indulging in serious crimes - Applicant alleged active member via calls, hotspot, international communication, photos, deposit - Sessions court rejected bail - High Court application filed.

Findings of Court:
No reasonable grounds believing applicant guilty; unlikely to reoffend given age and antecedents - Bail on executing bond with sureties, reporting, passport deposit, no tampering, state restriction.

Issues: Whether prosecution material prima facie establishes organised crime complicity justifying bail denial under stringent provision.

Ratio Decidendi: Material must demonstrate more than prima facie links to syndicate for denial - Absence in detailed co-accused confessions, unproven call content/context, unsupported allegations fail test - Balance individual liberty with public interest at pre-trial stage.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. mcoca charges in baba siddiqui murder case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. no incriminating evidence against applicant. (Para 5)
3. circumstantial links via calls, hotspot, photos. (Para 6 , 7)
4. mcoca s.21(4) twin bail conditions. (Para 8 , 9)
5. insufficient material for prima facie guilt. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. precedents weigh reasonable grounds for bail. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. no reoffending risk; bail appropriate. (Para 18 , 19)
8. bail granted with conditions; prima facie views. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

NEELA GOKHALE, J.

1. By this Application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with C.R. No. 589 of 2024 dated 13th October 2024 registered with the Nirmalnagar Police Station, Brihanmumbai City, for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 125 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and Section 3, 5, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 37 and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Thereafter, the provisions of (1)(i)(ii), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (for short ‘MCOCA’) were added.

2. The offence relates to the murder of one Ziauddin Abdul Rahim Siddiqui @ Baba Siddiqui, former Minister in the State of Maharashtra.

3. The facts as discerned from the FIR are as follows:

i) The First Informant is a police constable attached to the Special Protection Unit of the Mumbai Police, entrusted with the personal security protection of one Ziauddin Abdul Rahim Siddiqui @ Baba Siddiqui, a former Minister, State of Maharashtra. There were other police officials deputed as bodyguards to provide security to Baba Siddiqui.

ii) On 12th October 2024, while the First Informant was on security duty, Baba Siddiqui visited his son's office at premise No.14, Building No.35, Khernagar, Nirmalnagar, Bandra (E), Mumbai. At about 09:30 pm., three unknown persons opened fire on him, while he was proceeding towards his car. Baba Siddiqui succumbed to his injuries and several persons present at the spot also sustained injuries. Accordingly, on the Complainant's detailed statement, FIR came to be registered.

iii) The two assailants, namely Accused No.1 and 2 - Gurmail Baljit Singh and Dharmaraj Radhe Kashyap respectively, were apprehended while they were fleeing from the spot. Upon their body search, firearms, live cartridges and other material was seized from them. Consequently, they were arrested on 13th October 2024.

iv) During the investigation, perusal of the crime record indicated that one Anmol Bishnoi, the gang leader, committed serious offences such as robbery, extortion, dacoity, murder, attempt to murder, using lethal firearms, recruiting youth and raising funds to carry out unlawful activities in various states. According to the Investigating Agency, an Organised Crime Syndicate, headed by wanted accused and gang leader, Anmol Bishnoi, was found to be indulging continuously in unlawful activities. Competent Courts of law had previously taken cognizance of two charge-sheets under the provisions of MCOCA, against said Anmol Bishnoi along with his brother Lawrence Bishnoi and other associates. Hence, approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner of Police under Section 23(1) of the MCOCA dated 29th November 2024 to add charges of MCOCA in the present case. Thereafter, the Special Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, also granted sanction under Section 23(2) of the Act dated 2nd January 2025. The charge-sheet was filed before the Special MCOCA Court, Mumbai.

v) Upon further inquiries and investigation in the case, involvement of 27 persons was revealed. One of them is the present Applicant, arraigned as Accused No.24. All the accused are in custody.

4. The Applicant made an application seeking bail before the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge under the MCOCA, however, by order dated 19th July 2025, the said application was rejected. Hence, the Applicant has filed the present Bail Application for the relief as prayed.

5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top