Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
J.J.Munir
Prithvi Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chief General Manager (HR), Union Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. MUNIR, J.
This writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by the Chief Manager, Union Bank of India, Varanasi (the Disciplinary Authority), the order of the Deputy General Manager (ERD), Union Bank of India, Mumbai (the Appellate Authority) dated 21.03.2023 and the order of the General Manager (Human Resource), Union Bank of India, Mumbai (the Reviewing Authority) dated 12.05.2023. By the first of these orders, the petitioner has been held guilty of service misconduct after disciplinary proceedings and punished inter alia with compulsory retirement, with superannuation benefits and without disqualification from future employment. By the second of these orders, the petitioner’s appeal from the order of the Disciplinary Authority has been rejected, and by the last of these orders made by the Reviewing Authority, the petitioner’s review too has been rejected.
2. The petitioner is an ex-serviceman, who served the Indian Navy. On the 10th of June, 2019, he was appointed to the clerical cadre of the Union Bank of India[‘Bank’ for short branch)] as a Single Window Operator-A. He was posted at the Chowki Bardah Branch, Azamgarh. He remained posted ther
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
