Sunita vs Parmjeet Kaur - 2025 Supreme(All) 3201

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 3201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Parmjeet Kaur – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Kushagra Singh, Namman Raj Vanshi
For the Respondent: Hemant Kumar

Table of Content
1. hearing of parties in court proceedings. (Para 1)
2. dispute over issuance and authenticity of rent receipts. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. previous case law emphasizing expert opinions in handwriting analysis. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments regarding the validity of signatures and authority. (Para 7 , 10 , 11)
5. fact of death of harbhajan kaur. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court's need for expert opinion in signature verification. (Para 12 , 13)
7. court's directive for proceeding with handwriting expert. (Para 14)
8. conclusion of the court's decision. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

AJIT KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Sri Namman Raj Vanshi, learned counsel for the revision applicant and Sri Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for the landlady/respondent.

2. This S.C.C. Revision is directed against the order passed by the Judge, Small Causes namely the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Meerut rejecting misc. application filed by the tenant/petitioner bearing paper no. 158-C2 seeking for handwriting expert opinion in respect of the disputed receipts bearing paper no. 33-C as according to the stand taken by the tenant the receipt against rent were used to be issued by the son of erstwhile landlady Harbhajan Kaur namely Sar