Purshottam vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 2487

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Purshottam – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashutosh Shukla,Ram Kishore Pandey
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Shree Prakash Giri

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

1. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shree Prakash Giri, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 6 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the revision under section 48 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "U.P.C.H. Act") was filed by the father of petitioners on 28.5.2022 before Deputy Director of Consolidation. The aforementioned revision arises out of proceeding under Section 9 of U.P.C.H. Act, which was registered as Revision No.63 of 2022. Respondent nos.3 to 6 were impleaded as opposite party in the aforementioned revision. During pendency of the aforementioned revision, an application dated 30.11.2023 for amendment of pleading made in the memo of revision was filed on behalf of the petitioners. Against the aforementioned amendment application, an objection was filed by the contesting respondents on 30.6.2024 with the prayer that amendment application cannot be allowed as proceedings are pending since 1997 and the amendment cannot be allowed at the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document