Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR
Anoop Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
Thomas T. Kurian – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajit Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Ishir Sripat, learned Advocate appearing for revision applicant and Shri Nipun Singh, learned Advocate assisted by Shri Naman Agarwal, learned counsel for opposite party.
2. A very short question arises for consideration of this Court in this revision application filed by the tenant petitioner, as to whether a small cause suit instituted for ejectment was maintainable in the face of the fact that tenancy agreement between the parties has been result of a written agreement entered on 27.08.2016 giving effect for a period of eleven months to run from 01.09.2016 to 31.07.2017 and which contained an arbitration clause vide clause 11 providing for arbitration between the parties in the event of any dispute arising out of the agreement of tenancy.
3. Facts are, since the tenancy was to end on 31.07.2017, the landlord first issued a notice on 01.05.2017 asking the tenant petitioner to vacate the premises in question on or before 15.07.2017 and handover the keys to the landlord. However, this notice was subsequently superseded by another notice dated 13.05.2017 asking the tenant petitioner to vacate the tenanted premises on 31.07.2017 i.e. the date on wh
The expiration of a tenancy agreement terminates the enforcement of its arbitration clause, allowing the landlord to maintain a suit for eviction.
Oral extensions of lease agreements do not sustain arbitration clauses; such clauses require written documentation to remain valid following the lease's expiration.
The arbitration clause remains valid and enforceable irrespective of the original tenancy agreement's expiration, allowing for dispute resolution through arbitration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to establish the existence of the oral tenancy and the bonafide requirement o....
The Supreme Court clarified that unregistered arbitration agreements are not void and emphasized the Referral Court's limited role regarding the enforceability of such agreements.
A landlord must issue a valid demand notice under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act before initiating eviction proceedings; failure to do so renders the suit invalid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
