Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
JASPREET SINGH
Devesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks registration under u.p. revenue code. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioners claim undue delay in case registration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court identifies procedural discrepancies by officials. (Para 6 , 9 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. court criticizes delay and lack of judicial oversight. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court orders immediate registration of all relevant cases. (Para 24) |
| 6. final order and directive for inquiry into officer's conduct. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Jaspreet Singh, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri P. V. Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue an order or direction, thereby commanding the opposite parties particularly opposite party no.3 to register the case, under Section 25 & 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 on application dated 05.09.2024, in compliance of the judgment/order dated 23.08.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in matters under Articel (A227) No.3906/2024, "Devesh Singh and another Vs. State of U.P. and others", in the interest of justice. True phocopy of the appl
Judicial officers must uphold promptitude and integrity, as failure to register cases and comply with court orders constitutes dereliction of duty.
State authorities must adhere to statutory timelines for adjudication to prevent denial of justice and ensure prompt legal redress.
The limitation of four months under Section 23 of the Registration Act should not prevent the registration of court decrees, as they are eternal unless varied, modified, or set aside by a higher judi....
Judicial proceedings must follow prescribed procedures; failure to document and hear parties leads to invalid orders, undermining public trust in the justice system.
Time spent in stamp duty adjudication excluded from limitation under Registration Act Sections 23/25; registration of BIFR sanctioned scheme orders directed post-final certification as vesting comple....
Imposition of registration penalty is unjustified if delay is not attributable to the executant, as established in the Indian Registration Act and supported by case law.
Summary proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code cannot adjudicate title disputes; petitioners may seek declaration of rights through a regular suit.
The court ruled that registration authorities must comply with court orders and cannot refuse registration based on previously set aside grounds.
Proper measurement and due process are essential in eviction proceedings, as statutory compliance safeguards against arbitrary actions by the authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
