Back
N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Anantha Rameshwari Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Since the issue raised in all these twenty four (24) writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. For the sake of convenience, WP No.16836 of 2024 is taken as a lead matter.
3. The common grievance in these writ petitions is that the Sub-Registrar, Pedda Amberpet, Ranga Reddy District i.e., respondent No.3 is refusing to register the sale deeds presented by the petitioners herein with respect to the subject property pertaining to the jurisdiction of Pedda Amberpet, Ranga Reddy District and had kept all the documents pending which is arbitrary illegal and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 & 300-A of the Constitution of India.
4. Since the rejection is common in all these writ petitions, WP No.16836 of 2024 is taken up as the lead matter in which the brief facts are that the petitioner purchased the land bearing Plot No.89, admeasuring 167 Sq.Yard or its equivalent to 139.61 Sq.mts. in Survey No.265(Part) situated at Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Revenue Mandal vide registered sale deed, dated 04.04.2006, bearing No.8234 of 2006, registered at SRO Pedda Amberpet. The petitioner with an intention to sell the subject property submitt
The court ruled that registration authorities must comply with court orders and cannot refuse registration based on previously set aside grounds.
A registering authority must adhere strictly to judicial orders, and any registration in contravention of such orders is void ab initio.
The registering authority must register a deed if all legal requirements are met, regardless of third-party objections regarding title, reaffirming the administrative role of the registration process....
The Sub-Registrar's powers to refuse registration are limited to specific grounds outlined in the Registration Act, and any refusal based on arbitrary reasons or external pressures is unlawful.
The Registering Officer must verify original documents for property registration to prevent fraud, and parties claiming rights must establish their claims before a competent court.
The Sub Registrar's role is administrative and limited to ensuring compliance with statutory formalities, and he does not have the authority to adjudicate or evaluate the rights of parties to make a ....
The Registrar's decision under the Registration Act is summary in nature and limited in operation, and the Registrar's jurisdiction is narrower compared to the plenary jurisdiction of the Civil Court....
The Sub-Registrar must independently decide on the registrability of a deed without needing clarification from the District Registrar, as their investigation into title is not permissible under law.
The Sub Registrar cannot refuse registration of a document solely due to title disputes unless it is proven the vendor has no title over the property in question.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
