Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
State of U.P. – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lease granted and cancellation initiated after 11 years. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's claim of illegality in lease execution. (Para 5) |
| 3. private respondents argue limitation issues. (Para 6) |
| 4. chronology of lease and cancellation events. (Para 8) |
| 5. importance of section 198(6) of u.p.z.a. (Para 9) |
| 6. limitation question can be raised at any time. (Para 10) |
| 7. abuse of process when filings occur after long delay. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 8. writ petition dismissed. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
1. Heard Mr. Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/ State, Mr. S.C. Verma & Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for private respondent no.4 and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.3- Land Management Committee.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the lease for agricultural purpose was granted in favour of private respondents on 3.1.1991, which was approved also on 4.1.1991 in accordance with law. The proceedings for cancellation of the aforementioned lease was initiated after about 11 years i.e. on 17.6.2002 by one Ramdhari. In the aforementioned cancellation proceedings, an objection was fil
Cancellation of agricultural lease after 11 years is barred by limitation, highlighting the importance of timely legal challenges in the context of land allotment under relevant laws.
Cancellation proceedings initiated after the limitation period are time-barred and cannot be entertained.
Cancellation of an agricultural lease based on time-barred complaints is legally impermissible, emphasizing adherence to statutory time limits as per U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
Public interest litigation challenging agricultural lease was dismissed as it was barred by limitation, emphasizing that limitation is a fundamental aspect of legal proceedings.
Cancellation of land leases must adhere to statutory limitation periods; proceedings initiated beyond these limits are illegal and violate principles of natural justice.
The statutory requirement of notice before lease cancellation is crucial; failing to comply invalidates such actions, reinforcing principles of due process.
The cancellation of land leases after a significant delay violates statutory provisions and principles of reasonable time, affirming the rights of long-term lessees under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition....
The principle of limitation is fundamental in administrative proceedings, and actions taken after substantial delays are unsustainable under law.
The court affirmed the agricultural lease granted to the petitioner, ruling that cancellation was arbitrary and lacked proper individual consideration, especially given the petitioner's eligibility a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
