SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1914

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Razia – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: V.C. Srivastava, Santosh Kumar Tiwari
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Anuj Kumar, Deepak Gaur

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Satyendra Nath Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Mr. Deepak Gaur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Gram Sabha.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 23.12.1990, petitioner along with 37 others were granted lease in respect to plot in dispute situated in Village- Panari, Pargana and Tehsil- Lalitpur, District- Lalitpur. Out of 38 lease only 14 lease were approved in which petitioner's lease was also approved. On the basis of private complaint proceedings under Section 198(4) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act were initiated and registered before Additional District Magistrate Lalitpur and petitioner's case was registered as Case No. 180/91-92 (State v. Rajia along with 13 others), case against respective leaseholders. Respondent No. 3/ Additional District Magistrate heard all the 14 cases for cancellation of lease and vide order dated 28.12.1992 lease of all the 14 lease holders including petitioner was cancelled. Petitioner and 13 others have filed their revision under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act before Commissioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top