HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PIYUSH AGRAWAL
In The Matter Of Swadeshi Mining & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of multiple counsels (Para 1) |
| 2. filing of multiple misc. company applications (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. common order for interconnected matters (Para 5) |
| 4. historical context of smmcl and ntc (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. nationalization and ownership implications (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal distinctions of subsidiary companies (Para 22 , 25 , 26 , 39 , 42) |
| 7. review of winding up proceedings (Para 30 , 31) |
| 8. rehabilitation scheme approval under sica (Para 57 , 58 , 60) |
| 9. consequences of failure to challenge sales (Para 61 , 64 , 66) |
| 10. court's order and consequences (Para 67 , 68 , 70) |
JUDGMENT :
PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Naveen Sinha, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Tarun Agarwal and Sri Prakhar Saran Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri J.Nagar, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Pratik J. Nagar, learned counsel for N.T.C., Sri S.P.Singh, learned Senior Advocate and ASGI assisted by Sri Purnendu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India and learned counsel for the Official Liquidator.
2. Misc. Company Application No. 37 of 2019 has been filed by the applicant - by M/s Balrampur Chini Mills Limited for directing the Official L

M/s Doypack Systems Private Limited Vs. Union of India & Others
Vodafone International Holdings BV Vs. Union of India
Madura Coats Limited Vs. Modi Rubber Limited & Another
M/s Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Company Limited Vs. The State of U.P. & Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.