JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Vimal Chaudhary, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashish Chand Nishad, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent- Gaon Sabha.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner no. 1 is chak holder no. 731 and petitioner no.2 is chak holder no.212. Original holding of the petitioner are 206 etc. The share of the petitioners over plot no.206 is 1/6. Plot no.206 is stated to be road side plot. Assistant Consolidation Officer has proposed two chaks to the petitioners. The first chak over plot no.575M, 574M area 0.264 hectare and second chak over plot no.206M area 0.470 hectare. Respondent no. 12 is chak holder no. 941 and original holding of respondent no.12 are plot no.206 etc having 1/6 share. The chak objection filed against the proposal of the Assistant Consolidation Officer was decided by the Consolidation Officer and chak appeal filed against the order of Consolidation Officer was decided by Settlement Officer of Consolidation. The