JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Mr. Shivajee Singh Sisodiya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.N. Shukla, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No.3, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Sher Bahadur Singh learned counsel for respondent No.4/Land Management Committee.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner and respondent No.3 are real brother. Petitioner is chak holder No.189 and respondent no.3 is chak holder No.872. Plot No.617 etc. are the original plot of petitioner and respondent No.3 which are mentioned in C.H. Form 23 (Part-1) as annexed along with writ petition. Petitioner was proposed three chak by consolidation officer first chak on plot No.615, Second chak on plot No.439 M etc and third chak on plot No.545M etc. Respondent No.3 was also proposed three chak, first chak om plot No.422 etc. Second Chak on plot NO.385 etc and third chak on plot No700 etc. Petitioner filed chak objection under Section 21 (1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 hereinafter referred as U.P.C.H. Act for allotment of chak on plot No.385 in place of his second chak allotted on plot No.439 etc. The other objection were also filed by the chak holders