IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
SAURABH LAVANIA
Tarawati – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:-
INDEX
A. FACTS OF THE CASE………………………………PAGE Nos.4 to 12
B. SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER(S)…………………………………………PAGE Nos.12 to 19.
C. SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE STATE…………………………………………………..PAGE Nos.19 to 32.
D. POINT(S)/ISSUE(S) FOR DETERMINATION……………………..PAGE No.32
E. DECISION ON POINT/ISSUE NO.1………………PAGE Nos.32 to 35
F. DECISION ON POINT/ISSUE NO.2………………PAGE Nos.35 to 44
G. DECISION ON POINT/ISSUE NO.3……………...PAGE Nos.44 to 68
H. CONCLUSION……………………………………………...PAGE No. 68
A. FACTS OF THE CASE-
2. Heard Shri Manish Singh, Shri Bajrangi Lal Mishra and Shri S.P. Singh Somvanshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel.
3. Before proceeding further in the matter, it would be apt to indicate the following facts:-
(i) In all the petitions, indicated above, the arguments were heard and judgment was reserved on 16.05.2025 and thereafter on 26.08.2025 this Court passed the following order:-
“At the time of dictating the judgment, which was reserved in the Court, this Court found that furt







ESI Corpn. v. KEY DEE Cold Storage (P) Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.