JASPREET SINGH
Bhagwati Deen – Appellant
Versus
Sheetladin – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In the instant petition, the dispute relates to Plot Nos. 1838/1, 1823/1, 1816, 1817, 1815, 1824/2 and 1828/1 of Gata No. 306 of Village Lokpur, Pargana, Barsona, Tehsil and District Sultanpur which was recorded in the name of the private respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 in the basic year Khatauni.
2. The petitioner had filed his objections under Section 9-A (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1953) staking claim over the disputed plots on the ground that the petitioner was in occupation of the disputed plots in question much prior to the abolition of Zamindari and thus had acquired sirdari rights in the land in dispute after the abolition of Zamindari. An alternate plea was also raised that since the petitioner was recorded as an occupant in 1359 Fasli and was in cultivatory possession three years prior to the abolition of Zamindari, hence, he acquired adhivasi rights which later matured into sirdari in 1362 Fasli and continued to be in possession.
3. It was also stated that the private respondents were influential p
Avdhesh Singh and Another Vs. Bikarama Ahir and others reported in 1975 RD 132
P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy v. Revamma
Vasantiben Prahladji Nayak v. Somnath Muljibhai Nayak
Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Government of India
Amba Prasad v. Abdul Noor Khan [AIR 1965 SC 54 : (1964) 7 SCR 800]
Katikara Chintamani Dora v. Guletreddi Annamanaidu [(1974) 1 SCC 567 : A.I.R. 1974 S.C. 1069.]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.