Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAJIV GUPTA, SAMIT GOPAL
Chandra Pal @ Rachit – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Samit Gopal, J.
[Delivered by Samit Gopal, J. for the Bench under Chapter VII Rule 1(2) of the ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT RULES , 1952]
1. Four persons namely Chandra Pal @ Rachit, Smt. Atarkali, Bablu (jeth) and Smt. Sharda (jethani) were named as accused in the FIR out of whom Bablu (jeth) and Smt. Sharda (jethani) were exonerated during investigation and thus Chandra Pal @ Rachit and Smt. Atarkali were only put to trial who were convicted by the trial court. Both the convicted accused Chandra Pal @ Rachit and Smt. Atarkali preferred jail appeals be- fore this Court. A represented appeal was filed by Atarkali before this Court which is numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 1574 of 2012. The jail appeal preferred by Chandra Pal @ Rachit was numbered as Jail Appeal No. 2708 of 2012. The represented appeal of appellant Atarkali was admitted vide order dated 20.12.2012 whereas the jail appeal of accused Chandra Pal @ Rachit was admitted vide order dated 19.07.2012. The aforesaid appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28.03.2012 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge (T) Court No.4, Ghaziabad in Session Trial No. 897 of 2011 (State of U.P. Vs. Chandra
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
