IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MADAN PAL SINGH
Gaurav Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Madan Pal Singh, J.
1. The Written submissions filed by the learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 are taken on record.
2. Heard Mr. Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the revisionist, Ms. Puja Bhargava Singh and Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh Paliwal, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist under Section 3 97 /401 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to set aside the judgment and order dated 8th October, 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.1, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 203 of 2022 (Ritika Gupta & Another Vs. Gaurav Gupta) under Section 125 Cr.P.C. District-Kanpur Nagar, whereby the trial court while allowing the application filed by opposite party nos.2 and 3 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has directed the revisionist to pay Rs. 20,000/- per month to opposite party no.2 (wife) and Rs.20,000/- per month to opposite party no.3 (daughter) i.e. total Rs. 40,000/- per month towards maintenance allowance from the date of filing of instant application.
4. The factual matrix of the case is that marriage of opposite pa
Kulbhushan Kumar (Dr) v. Raj Kumari
Kalyan Dey Chowdhury Vs. Rita Dey
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.