Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajit Kumar, Swarupama Chaturvedi
Rahimuddin – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Swarupama Chaturvedi, J.
1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Aditya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Agresh Agarwal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Arvind Nath Agarwal, learned panel counsel appearing for respondents.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2-Regional Passport Officer, District Bareilly to re-issue passport to the petitioner for a period of ten years pursuant to the No Objection Certificate (NOC) dated 10.10.2024 issued by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit as the passport was issued earlier to the petitioner for a period of one year.
3. Background facts of this case are that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Writ C No. 30083 of 2024 (Rahimuddin vs. Union of India and Another), seeking a direction to the respondents to issue a passport in his favour, as the matter remained pending before passport office for one criminal case, arising out of FIR No.181 of 2016 under Section 447 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 being pending against him. The Division Bench ha
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
