IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Sushant Prashar @ Sushant Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation Thru. Cbi/Acb Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investigation and charge-sheet filed by cbi. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. bail applications decided together due to common fir. (Para 6 , 7 , 28 , 32) |
| 3. details of the criminal conspiracy and bribery. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal principles regarding bail in economic offences. (Para 34 , 56 , 58 , 76 , 80) |
| 5. arguments regarding lack of evidence and absence of direct involvement. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. court's conclusion on granting bail. (Para 66 , 67 , 83 , 85) |
| 7. arguments against the release on bail concerning economic offences. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Pranjal Krishna, the learned counsel for the applicant in Bail Application Nos. 7025/2025 and 7244/2025 and Sri Purnendu Chakravarty in Bail Application Nos. 7518/2025 and 6252/2025, Sri Pranshu Agrawal in Bail Application No. 6155/2025, Sri Himanshu Hemant Gupta in Bail Application no. 7067/2025, Sri Satendra Kumar Singh and Sri Shivam in Bail Application 6553/2025, Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra and Sri Vinay Kumar in Bail Application No. 7700/2025 and Sri Aakash Prasad, the learned counsel for the respondent - Central Bureau of Investigation assisted
Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Another
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Satender Kumar Antil versus CBI
Subramanya v. State of Karnataka
State of Karnataka v. David Rozario
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.