SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3501

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MADAN PAL SINGH
Pramod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : G.N. Chandra, M.C. Singh and V.K. Jaiswal.

JUDGMENT :

MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

1. Heard Mr. M.C. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Raj Bahadur Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8th December, 1987 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Sessions Trial No. 376 of 1984 (State Vs. Pramod Kumar & 2 Others) under Sections 307 and 307/34 I.P.C., Police Station-Zarifnagar, District- Budaun, whereby the accused-appellant nos. 1 and 3 have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C. and accused-appellant no.2 Ram Patti has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 I.P.C. and they had been sentenced as follows:

“1. Accused-appellant no.1 was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 5 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default thereof, he had to further undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment;

2. Accused-appellant no.3 Smt. Vidyawati was sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default thereof, she had to further undergo six month rigorous imprisonment;

3. Accused-appellant no.2 Ram Patti was sentenced to 2 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top