IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
Irshad Ali, J.
State of U.P. Thru Collector Shrawasti - Petitioner
Versus
Anwar Alam and others - Respondents
WRIT - C No. - 3000108 of 2002
Decided On : 19-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on the dispute over land holdings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. process of filing and subsequent legal challenges. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments against the legitimacy of the will deed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. counterarguments from the respondents regarding the will deed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court's reasoned analysis of authority decisions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. Heard Sri Arya Shresth Tiwari, learned Additional CSC for the petitioner - State and Sri Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the intervenor.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.10.1999 passed by respondent No.6 contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition and to restore the order dated 31.10.1994 passed by the Prescribed Authority contained as Annexure No.5 to this writ petition.
3. The writ petition is directed against the order dated 14-10-99 passed by opp. party no.6 in appeal No.57; Pateshwar Verma & others- Versus - State of U.P and others, including No.508/5-350 hectares (13- 173 acres) irrigated land from the surplus land declared by the prescribed authority vide order dated 27-03-1999. Certified Copy of the order dated 14-10-99 passed by opp. party no.6, is annexed as Annexure No.1 and the true copy of the order dated 27-03-1999 passed by Prescribed Authority is annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition, respectively.
4. The notices under section 10(2) of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred as the Ceiling Act) was issued to original tenure holder namely Bhagwan Singh, predecessor-in- interest of opp. party no.4 and 5 and objection was filed by the original tenure holder. True copy of the objection filed by the original tenure holder namely Bhagwan Singh dated 30/31-8-94 is annexed as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition.
5. The original tenure holder namely Bhagwan Singh had taken specific plea in his objection dated 30/31-8-91 to the effect that plot no.508/5-350 hectares (13-173 acres) had wrongly been clubbed with the holding of the objector as the said plot belong to Pradeep Singh son of Jagdeep Singh.
6. Learned Prescribed Authority by means of order dated 31-03-1994 rejected the objection of the original tenure holder namely Bhagwan Singh and held that plot no.508 has rightly been included in the holding of Shri Bhagwan Singh. True copy of the order dated 31-03-1994 passed by Prescribed Authority is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the writ petition.
7. It is relevant to point out that the specific issue regarding title of Bhagwan Singh over plot no.508 situate in village Bargadaha has become final as this issue was not challenged at any forum.
8. Opposite party no.1 to 3 preferred appeal No. 115 under Section 13 of the Ceiling Act Anwar Alam and others Versus State of U.P. and learned opp. party no.6 by means of order dated 29-01-1997 set aside the order of Prescribed Authority dated 31-10-1994 and remanded the case for decision afresh. True copy of the order dated 31-10-1991 is annexed as Annexure No.5 and true copy of the order passed by Addl. Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad dated 29-01-1997 is annexed as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition.
9. Opposite party no.1 to 3 filed writ petition No.79 of 1995 Anwar alam & others-Versus- Addl. Commissioner and others and the Hon'ble High Court by means of order dated 21-06-1995 allowed the writ petition and directed the appellate court to pass appropriate order in the appeal. True copy of the order dated 21-06-1995 is annexed as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition.
10. The final order was passed by the appellate court on 29-01-1997 as indicated above, remanding the case for decision afresh. The Prescribed Authority by means of order dated 27-03-1999 rejecte
The appellate authority’s reliance on will deeds for land titling, based on proper evidence and administrative remand, was upheld, confirming that past rulings subject to reconsideration do not apply....
Authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Ceiling Act must prove surplus claims with adequate evidence; failure to adhere to principles of natural justice and misclassification of land holdings rendered th....
The court established that land transfers made after the reference date under the Ceiling Act are not valid for determining surplus land, and the burden of proof regarding the classification of land ....
Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act does not permit retroactive scrutiny of land transfers pre-dating statutory cut-off; failure to follow judicial precedents constitutes a breach of natural j....
Subordinate courts must comply with remand orders from higher authorities, and failure to do so renders subsequent orders unsustainable, especially in matters affecting legal heirs.
The court held that valid sale deeds executed before the appointed date under the Ceiling Act must be considered, and notices issued post-death of the tenure holder are invalid.
Prescribed Authority and the Appellate Court did not have valid or sufficient grounds for rejecting the revised choice indicated by the petitioner because the choice can be revised till such time his....
Orders against deceased individuals are null and void if legal heirs are not substituted and natural justice principles are violated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.