Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
IRSHAD ALI
State of U.P. Thru Collector Shrawasti – Appellant
Versus
Anwar Alam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on the dispute over land holdings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. process of filing and subsequent legal challenges. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments against the legitimacy of the will deed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. counterarguments from the respondents regarding the will deed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court's reasoned analysis of authority decisions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Arya Shresth Tiwari, learned Additional CSC for the petitioner - State and Sri Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the intervenor.
3. The writ petition is directed against the order dated 14-10-99 passed by opp. party no.6 in appeal No.57; Pateshwar Verma & others- Versus - State of U.P and others, including No.508/5-350 hectares (13- 173 acres) irrigated land from the surplus land declared by the prescribed authority vide order dated 27-03-1999. Certified Copy of the order dated 14-10-99 passed by opp. party no.6, is annexed as Annexure No.1 and the tru
The appellate authority’s reliance on will deeds for land titling, based on proper evidence and administrative remand, was upheld, confirming that past rulings subject to reconsideration do not apply....
Authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Ceiling Act must prove surplus claims with adequate evidence; failure to adhere to principles of natural justice and misclassification of land holdings rendered th....
The court established that land transfers made after the reference date under the Ceiling Act are not valid for determining surplus land, and the burden of proof regarding the classification of land ....
Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act does not permit retroactive scrutiny of land transfers pre-dating statutory cut-off; failure to follow judicial precedents constitutes a breach of natural j....
Subordinate courts must comply with remand orders from higher authorities, and failure to do so renders subsequent orders unsustainable, especially in matters affecting legal heirs.
The court held that valid sale deeds executed before the appointed date under the Ceiling Act must be considered, and notices issued post-death of the tenure holder are invalid.
Prescribed Authority and the Appellate Court did not have valid or sufficient grounds for rejecting the revised choice indicated by the petitioner because the choice can be revised till such time his....
Orders against deceased individuals are null and void if legal heirs are not substituted and natural justice principles are violated.
Notice to tenure holder - Limitation - Ceiling area and surplus area - If a land has come to be held by a tenure holder under Section 29, Prescribed Authority shall proceed to determine ceiling area ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
