SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3699

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
C/M , Chutki Bhandar Girls Inter College And Another – Petitioners
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. And  Others –Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 14000 of 2025
Decided On : 04-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vikas Singh, Mahendra Bahadur Singh
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Indra Pratap Singh

The principle of natural justice mandates that a Committee of Management must be given an opportunity to be heard before disapproval of its recommendation for dismissal or similar actions.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16 G(3)(b) - Principles of Natural Justice - Order of the District Inspector of Schools disapproving the Committee of Management's recommendation for dismissal of services quashed - The Inspector must afford an opportunity to the Committee before passing adverse orders, as per natural justice principles. (Paras 12, 25, 27)

(B) Employment Law - The principles dictate that no person should be unheard when adverse consequences may arise from administrative decisions - Prior notice and opportunity to be heard are fundamental rights when dealing with dismissal or similar actions. (Paras 17, 26)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenge the order disapproving a recommendation for the dismissal of a lecturer who allegedly acted unruly after assuming the role of acting principal. The District Inspector of Schools rejected the dismissal recommendation without hearing from the Committee of Management.

Findings of Court:
The order disapproving the dismissal is quashed, necessitating a fresh decision by the District Inspector with adherence to proper procedural requests for hearing.

Issues: Whether the District Inspector of Schools was obliged to hear the Committee of Management’s recommendation for dismissal before issuing a disapproval?

Ratio Decidendi: The principle of natural justice requires that any adverse decision must follow a proper opportunity to be heard. As the Committee was not given a chance to defend its dismissal recommendation, the order was invalid and quashed.

Result: The order dated 26-09-2025 is quashed and the matter is remitted back to the District Inspector for fresh decision-making.

Table of Content
1. facts of the case and prior actions taken. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
2. petitioners' arguments on natural justice and right to be heard. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observation on procedural compliance and pending decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. legal provisions regarding dismissal and procedural fairness. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. principles of natural justice requiring opportunity to contest adverse actions. (Para 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. court statements on necessity of hearing before dismissals. (Para 25 , 26)
7. order quashing the previous decision and remitting for fresh consideration. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

1. Heard Mr. M.B. Singh and Mr. Vikas Singh, learned counsels for the petitioners, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Indra Pratap Singh, learnedcounsel for the opposite party no. 6.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 26-09-2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools-II, Lucknow, whereby the matter has been remitted back to the Committee of Management, while disapproving the recommendation of the Committee of Management, for dismissal ofthe services of the opposite party no. 6.

3. Briefly stated facts are that Chutki Bhandar Girls Intermediate College, Lucknow(hereafter referred to as 'College'), is recognized by the U.P. Intermediate Education Board and imparts education upto intermediate and the college receives grant-in-aid from the state government and the provisions of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 2021 as well as the U.P. High School and Intermediate College(Payment of Salary to the Teachers and Other Employees) Act,1971, are fully applicable on the teaching and non teaching staffsof the college.

4. Factual matrix of the case are that Smt. Shubhra Pandey, took voluntarily retirement, who was working as adhoc principal and thereafter, opposite party no 6, Dr. Suman Shukla, who was working as Lecturer (Civics) in the college, was given the charge of the post of Principal, on officiating basis, on 01-03-2024 and her signatures were sent for approval and attestation, before the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), which was returned by him, without any approval.

5. It is said that after the officiating charge was given to opposite party no. 6, her behaviour was observed as being rude and uncalled for and she has also started disobeying the instructions of the Committee of Management of the college. On several complaints received against the opposite party no. 6, the preliminary enquiry was instituted against her and thereafter, the Committee of Management in it's meeting dated 13-07-2024, has unanimously resolved for handing over the charge to the another seniormost teacher, namely, Smt. Sunita on place of opposite party no. 6 and the opposite party no. 6 was directed to hand over the charge to Smt. Sunita, but, that was declined by her and she forcibly continued herself as officiating Principal and created unpleasant and awkward situation and thereafter looking into the unruly behaviour of opposite party no. 6, under the compelling circumstances, the Committee of Management suspended her and contemplated an enquiry proceeding and the papers regarding the approval of suspension have also been forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools, Lucknow for it's approval, which was disapproved and being aggrieved , the Committee of Management instituted Writ A No. 8442 of 2025, wherein this Hon'ble Court passed the order, on 21-11-2025, whereby the order of disapproval dated 09-07-2025, passed by the District Inspector of Schools, has been quashed and the matter has been remitted back to the DIOS-II Lucknow to pass order afresh, which is still pending consideration.

6. Further, facts are that in the meanwhile, the Enquiry Committee constituted by the college of management for conducting enquiry against the opposite party no. 6, completed the enquiry proceedings and sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top