IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, CHAWAN PRAKASH
Achhaibarrs – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeal context and prior sentencing (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the incident and witnesses' accounts (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. investigation process and evidence collection (Para 8 , 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. court's examination of witness credibility (Para 23 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 5. defendant's arguments on prosecution inconsistencies (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. vicarious liability under ipc sections 149 and 302 (Para 52 , 56) |
| 7. final dismissal of the criminal appeal (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
JUDGMENT :
CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been filed against a judgment dated 27.05.1987 and order dated 01.6.1987 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Basti in ST No. 184 of 1985, under Sections 147, 148 and 302/149 IPC, police station Bakhira, district Basti, whereby the learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced all the appellants namely Achhaibar (Ram Achhaibar), Phoolman, Sanwarey, Rajendra and Ram Dass to imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. Accused Achhaibar, Ram Dass, Phoolman and Sanwarey were further convicted under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to one year’s rigorous imprisonment, whereas accused Raj
State Represented by Inspector of Police Vs. Saravanam and another
Shivaji Vs. State of Maharashtra
Edakkandi Dineshan alias P. Dineshan and others Vs. State of Kerala
Krishnappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Vs. Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel
Krishnappa Vs. State of Karnataka
The principle of vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC confirms that all members of an unlawful assembly are guilty of offenses committed in prosecution of a common object, regardless of individu....
The prosecution must prove the formation of an unlawful assembly and the shared common object beyond reasonable doubt, and essential witnesses must be produced to unfold the narrative.
The court ruled that evidence from interested witnesses is credible if consistent and supported by circumstances, necessitating careful evaluation of roles in unlawful assemblies under IPC.
In cases of unlawful assembly leading to murder, all involved members can be held vicariously liable, and eyewitness testimonies must be credible even if witnesses are related to the victim.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.