SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 89

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TEJ PRATAP TIWARI
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Dileep Kumar Shukla, Shiv Kumar Singh

JUDGMENT :

TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1137 of 2020 ( State Vs. Mahendra Singh and others ), arising out of Case Crime No. 0091 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and 3/4 DP Act, Police Station Tehrauli, District Jhansi, charge sheet dated 20.10.2019 as well as cognizance order dated 12.10.2020 passed in the aforesaid case, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Garautha, Jhansi.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 04.09.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned on 17.09.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

4. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top