Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TEJ PRATAP TIWARI
Mahendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial court hearing and participants (Para 1) |
| 2. application details and underlying case information (Para 2) |
| 3. verification of compromise deed by the court (Para 3) |
| 4. precedent on quashing cases based on settlements (Para 4) |
| 5. justification for quashing the case (Para 5) |
| 6. ruling to quash proceedings (Para 6 , 7) |
TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1137 of 2020 ( State Vs. Mahendra Singh and others ), arising out of Case Crime No. 0091 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and 3/4 DP Act, Police Station Tehrauli, District Jhansi, charge sheet dated 20.10.2019 as well as cognizance order dated 12.10.2020 passed in the aforesaid case, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Garautha, Jhansi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 04.09.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned whic
Settlement between parties can lead to the quashing of legal proceedings, as established in precedent. Courts may exercise quashing powers when grievances are resolved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
