HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VIKRAM D.CHAUHAN, J.
Raj Bihari Singh @ Raj Bihari And Others - Applicants
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another – Respondents
APPLICATION U/s 482 No. - 37780 of 2019
Decided On : 28-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of criminal case (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments against instigation to suicide (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. analysis of abetment of suicide (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's findings on offences (Para 18 , 24) |
| 5. examination of sections 504 & 506 ipc and sc/st act (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. final order of the court (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Govind Saran Hajela, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sher Singh, learned counsel for the Opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is preferred by applicants for quashing charge-sheet as well as order dated 6.8.2019 taking cognizance under Sections 306, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 pending before Special Judge, (SC/ST) Act, Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi in Special Session Trial No. 228 of 2019 ( Sarkar Vs. Raj Bihari Singh and others ). The above-mentioned criminal case arises out of First Information Report dated 13.3.2019 in Case Crime No. 148 of 2019 at Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi.
3. At the initial filing of present application before this Court applicants have also made a prayer for quashing of offence under Section 3(1)(v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. However, subsequently the above- mentioned order dated 6.8.2019 was corrected by order dated 21.10.2019 (copy of the aforesaid order is filed along with the counter affidavit of the informant before this Court). In view of the above-mentioned correction order dated 21.10.2019, the prayer for quashing the offence under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is hereby substituted the prayer for offence under Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in place of Section 3(1)(v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
4. The applicants have also filed supplementary affidavit dated 16.10.2019 stating that due to clerical mistake name of applicant no. 1 namely Raj Bihari Singh @ Raj Bihari has been wrongly typed in place of Raj Bihari Singh.
5. Initially, First Information Report dated 13.3.2019 was lodged by Ratan Lal Gond against applicants and two other persons, namely, Manik Chand and Vinod Bharti Lekhpal under Sections 306, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. As per allegations in above-mentioned First Information Report, it is alleged by informant that informant is resident of Village Bandepur, Police Station Rohaniya, District Varanasi. The informant is having land dispute with Manik Chand who is resident of same village. Some persons are trying to get the caste of informant being Scheduled Tribe cancelled in which the Area Lekhpal – Vinod Bharti in conspiracy with Village Pradhan – Raj Bihari (Applicant no. 1), Mohd Naeem (Applicant no. 3), Shiv Adhar Singh (Applicant no. 2), Lal Mohammad (Applicant no. 4) in order to get the Scheduled Tribes status of informant being declared as forged has got submitted report that informant belongs to Badbhuja caste. As a result of same, father of informant was shocked and accused persons use to abuse father of informant while on road. On account of informant being declared as Badbhuja caste, father of informant was shocked and as a result of the same on 12.3.2019 in the night committed suicide by hanging at the house of informant.
6. In pursuance to the above-mentioned First Information Report, the Investigating Officer recorded statement of informant who has supported the First Information Report allegations and has further stated that the caste certificate of informant was prepared in the year 2012 and th
Instigation requires direct incitement to suicide with a clear nexus; mere participation in an inquiry does not amount to abetment under IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the careful consideration of the factual scenario and the application of legal principles related to abetment of suicide and intentional insult und....
The court quashed the FIR and proceedings under the Atrocities Act, finding no prima facie case against the applicant and emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of legal processes.
For a charge of abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, there must be clear evidence of instigation or incitement by the accused, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient without a dire....
Abetment of suicide – Necessary ingredients of offence must be fulfilled by prosecution.
The court emphasized that for offences under the Atrocities Act, the alleged insult must occur in public view, which was not established in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that if the allegations in the FIR do not prima facie constitute a case against the accused, the proceedings can be quashed.
The court clarified that for offences under the Atrocities Act, allegations must occur in public view, and prosecution can be quashed in part based on the sufficiency of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.