SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAJNISH KUMAR, ZAFEER AHMAD
Shiv Pujan Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : S.S. Imam Rizvi, Diwakar Singh, Rajiva Dubey

JUDGMENT :

ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

1. Heard Sri Rajiva Dubey learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Pawan Kumar Singh learned A.G.A for the State.

2. The aforesaid criminal appeal arises out of order and judgment dated 15.12.2007 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Balrampur in S.T. No. 48 of 2006 ( State v. Shiv Pujan ) arising out of case crime no. 06 of 2006 wherein the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment u/s 302 Indian Penal Code (in short I.P.C).

Prosecution Case in Nutshell:

3. The prosecution case, in nutshell, is that the complainant Mangal Prasad Verma submitted a written report (Ex. Ka-1) at Police Station Jarwa, District Balrampur, stating therein that his father Shiv Pujan had two brothers, namely Munshi and Nibber. Shiv Pujan was the eldest, Munshi was the second and Nibber was the youngest. All the three brothers were living separately. The second brother Munshi used to reside with his parents, namely Ragunath and Kamla, in a seperate house situated at the edge of the forest. Furthermore, it was stated that on the morning of 17.01.2006, his uncle Nibber came and informed him that during the preceding night, some unknown persons had dragged Mun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top