SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1602

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Valmiki Menezes, Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ.
Shri. Manohar Ketkar - Appellant
Versus
State of Goa and ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No.18 of 2025
Decided On : 14-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pravin C. Naik with Mr. Sanket Mahambre, Mr. Aditya Tanksali, Ms. Namrata Shirodkar and Mr. Roland Fernandes, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Shailendra Bhobe, Public Prosecutor

The court held that mere suspicion is insufficient for a conviction; a complete chain of circumstantial evidence is required to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Appeal against conviction for murder - Conviction and sentence set aside due to lack of direct evidence and insufficient circumstantial evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Established that the prosecution evidence raised suspicion but did not connect the Appellant to the crime. (Paras 44, 43, 42)

(B) Circumstantial evidence - Legal principles for circumstantial evidence highlighted, stating that the chain of circumstances must be complete to lead to the guilt of the accused - Suspicion is insufficient for conviction. (Paras 8, 10, 19)

Facts of the case:
Appellant was convicted for the murder of his wife, leading to a life sentence. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged extra-judicial confession and a strained marital relationship. (Paras 2, 8)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of evidence proving guilt and highlighted deficiencies in the investigation. (Paras 43, 42)

Issues: The main issues involved whether the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to prove the guilt of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that mere suspicion is not enough for conviction without solid evidence, emphasizing need for a complete chain of evidence for determining guilt. (Paras 8, 10, 43)

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction quashed and the appellant acquitted.

JUDGMENT :

Shreeram V. Shirsat, J.

1. Registry to waive office objections and register the matter.

2. The Appeal is filed challenging the conviction of the Appellant vide Judgment and Order dated 17/08/2024 and 22/08/2024 in Sessions Case No.29/2014 passed by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, at Mapusa, wherein the Appellant was convicted under Section 302 of The INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and was directed to pay fine of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 2 months.

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:-

a. That on 19/11/2013, a complaint was filed by Mr. Manoj Manohar Ketkar to the effect that on 18/11/2013 at about 14:30 hrs., Accused/Appellant Manohar Ketkar committed murder of his wife Manisha Manohar Ketkar (Mother of the Complainant) over suspect of her character.

b. That upon receipt of such information, Bicholim Police Station registered Crime No. 203/2013 at 1:30 hrs. under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860. That in pursuance of the said complaint, a search in Ladfem area near Nestle Factory was conducted by the Police Inspector Mr. Neenad Deulkar and during the said search at about a distance of around 300 to 350 meters approximately a shed was noticed wherein a dead body was seen lying. As it was night time, the scene of offence was not disturbed and the same was preserved and guarded by deploying police constables to guard the scene.

c. Further on 19/11/2013 at 08:00hrs, Police Inspector Neenad Deulkar along with staff of Bicholim Police Station left for investigation. The Police Inspector then secured presence of two Panchas namely Mr. Mohan Chandrakant Gaonkar and Mr. Vishram Yeshwant Gawade and photographer namely Srinivasan R. Naik and conducted panchanama of scene of offence in the property of Mr. Savoikar at Kulan, Ladfem, Bicholim- Goa. During the scene of offence panchanama, certain incriminating articles were seized which were attached and marked. That the dead body of the deceased was seen in the said property in a structure built with laterite stones and partly with asbestos sheets. The said dead body was then removed and identified by the Complainant Mr. Manoj Ketkar to be of his mother namely Mrs. Manisha Manohar Ketkar (Wife of the Appellant). After concluding the scene of offence panchanama in the presence of the same pancha witnesses, inquest Panchanama was conducted.

d. That during the inquest Panchanama the Investigating Officer observed that the chin of the deceased was tied with the white cloth and with the cotton thread. Some jute thread was seen tied around the neck of the deceased, and both the hands of the deceased were tied with the jute thread at the back.

e. That on 20/11/2013, Dr. Pannag S. Kumar, Assistant Lecturer, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim-Goa, conducted post mortem examination of the dead body of the deceased Mrs. Manisha Manohar Ketkar and vide Autopsy Report No. 1071/2013 dated 20/11/2013 certified that the cause of death is due to “Asphyxia as a result of strangulation by ligature vide injury No.1 which was ante mortem and fresh at the time of death and necessarily fatal”. The necessary exhibits and viscera were also collected and preserved, so also sample of blood of the deceased was collected and sent to Medical Officer on duty of Blood Bank, GMC, Bambolim. Dr. Clare S. D’Mello of Blood Bank, GMC Bambolim, conducted blood grouping test in respect of blood sample of deceased which was forwarded by the Police Surgeon in sealed condition with the seal of the Forensic Medicine, GMC Bambolim and certified that the blood of the deceased was Hemolysed.

f. That on 22/11/2013, A.S.I Rama P.N. Gaonkar in the presence of two pancha witnesses namely Mr. Vishant Hari Tari and Vishnu Yeshwant Gawas conducted attachment panchanama in respect of the clothes/belongings of the deceased Mrs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top